In 2025, 33 states across the U.S. considered new laws on geoengineering and weather modification. Most of these bills did not pass, and only two states created new laws. In Georgia, the only action was House Resolution 513 (HR 513), which at first seemed procedural.

The timing gives this impression. The sponsors introduced HR 513 on March 6, 2025, which was "Crossover Day," the last day for a bill to pass its original chamber in the General Assembly. By introducing it on this deadline, the sponsors made sure it would not move forward right away.

Introducing a measure specifically to stall was a calculated strategy by experienced legislators to prepare the resolution for 2026.

The So-Called Failure on Crossover Day Was a Strategic Move

Crossover Day, Legislative Day 28, is the firm deadline for bills to pass their original chamber. Representative Gerald Greene and five other Republicans sponsored HR 513. They put it in the House Hopper on March 6, read it for the first time on March 10, and read it for the second time on March 11. With this timing, the resolution could not move forward during that session.

But this was intentional. The timing served key goals for the sponsors, especially Representative Greene, whose experience and influence give the resolution weight.

The introduction of the resolution signals to constituents that their representatives are actively addressing their concerns, even if the resolution doesn't pass immediately. Furthermore, by introducing HR 513, lawmakers establish a formal avenue for public discussion on the matter. Introducing the bill now is a strategic move that provides sponsors and supporters with valuable time to build consensus and support in the lead-up to the next legislative session. This ploy affords lawmakers a whole year to study the issue, build a broader consensus, and thoroughly prepare the resolution for genuine consideration.

A Soft Resolution, Not a Hard Ban, and That’s the Point

It is essential to know the difference between a House Bill (HB) and a House Resolution (HR) in Georgia. A bill must pass both the House and Senate and get the Governor’s signature to become a state law. HR 513, on the other hand, is a simple resolution. It only shows the opinion or feeling of the House of Representatives and does not need approval from the Senate or the Governor.

HR 513's approach is very different from the strict laws passed in states like Tennessee and Florida. Those states enacted complete bans on geoengineering; for example, Tennessee’s law classifies violations as a 'Class C misdemeanor.' By choosing a resolution, sponsors picked an option that is much easier to pass. This format lets lawmakers make a strong political statement without navigating the whole legislative process or risking a legal fight over state and federal control of U.S. airspace.

The Resolution Is Dormant, Not Dead, Because of a Legislative Rule

Georgia’s General Assembly holds a two-year session, called a biennial session. The 2025-2026 period counts as one legislative term. There is an important "carry-over" rule. Any bill or resolution introduced in the first year (2025) that does not pass or fail stays active for the second year (2026).

Because the House never voted on HR 513, the bill survived the end of the 2025 session. It now sits dormant in committee, where legislators can consider it immediately in the 2026 session while retaining its original number and sponsors.

It’s a State-Level Move Aimed at the Federal Government

HR 513 does not try to create a new state law. Its main goal is to ask Congress to investigate atmospheric chemical dispersal, so it is a state action directed at the federal government.

Overall, HR 513 helps Georgia reinforce federal efforts, building pressure for national action.

What to Expect in 2026

Georgia’s HR 513 is not a failed effort but a measured step likely to reemerge in 2026. Introducing it on Crossover Day got it on the agenda, and as a non-binding resolution, it only needs House approval.

Since all lawmakers are up for election in 2026, HR 513 is an attractive choice. It lets legislators show support for a widespread issue without spending money. How it moves through the committee will show its chances. If it passes, it will send a clear message from Georgia to Washington about the state’s role in federal advocacy.